HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Rapid Responses: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Levine, S. M. Articles by Mayberry, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Levine, S. M. Articles by Mayberry, R. M.

Complementary and Alternative Medical Practices: Training, Experience, and Attitudes of a Primary Care Medical School Faculty

Stephen M. Levine, MA, Margaret L. Weber-Levine, PhD and Robert M. Mayberry, MPH, PhD

From the Public Health Sciences Institute (SML) and the Department of Psychology (MLW-L) Morehouse College; and the Morehouse Medical Treatment Effectiveness Center (SML, RMM), Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Margaret L. Weber-Levine, PhD, Department of Psychology, Morehouse College, 830 Westview Dr SW, Atlanta, GA 30314

Background: Interest in alternative and complementary medical practices has grown considerably in recent years. Previous surveys have examined attitudes of the general public and practicing physicians. This study examined the training, experience, and attitudes of medical school faculty, who have the primary responsibility for the education of future family physicians.

Methods: A 24-item, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to all 200 faculty at a medical school with a mission of training primary care physicians.

Results: Of 30 therapies listed, 5 were considered legitimate medical practices by more than 70% of the faculty. Eighty-five percent of the respondents reported some training in alternative medical therapies, and 62% were interested in additional training. Eighty-three percent of the faculty reported personal experience with alternative therapies and most rated these as effective. Eighty-five percent of the respondents indicated that their general attitude toward alternative medicine is positive.

Conclusions: The results indicate that respondents have had substantial exposure to complementary therapies, are interested in learning more about these therapies, and have generally positive attitudes toward alternative medical practices and their use. Because of the role of these therapies in prevention, the positive attitudes might reflect the mission of this medical school to train primary care physicians.